🔗 Share this article

Jennifer Lawrence has joined the increasing number of actors who express doubts about the necessity of intimacy coordinators, explaining she chose not to use their assistance while working on her latest project her upcoming film.

Examining the Role of On-Set Intimacy Professionals

Intimacy coordinators were introduced following the #MeToo era to ensure the security and comfort of performers during scenes involving partial undress and intimate moments. However, numerous well-known actors including Gwyneth Paltrow and other established stars have expressed reservations about their presence, with several claiming they disrupt artistic process.

Lawrence's Personal Experience

Speaking during the Las Culturistas podcast, while promoting her new film where she plays a character experiencing mental health challenges, Lawrence commented: "We chose not to use an intimacy coordinator, or perhaps we did have one but didn't really utilize them... I felt entirely secure with Rob."

She elaborated: "He is not pervy and deeply devoted to Suki Waterhouse. Our conversations mostly revolved around our children and relationships. There was absolutely no awkward tension or questions about professional limits."

"If there was the slightest indication of unease, I definitely would have requested an on-set professional. Numerous male performers get upset if you aren't interested in their attention, and then the retaliation begins. He was completely different."

Industry Recognition and Continuing Discussion

Recently, industry platform IMDb officially recognized intimacy coordinators as a separate category, together with eleven other professional roles including choreography, craft services, and puppet operation. Previously, they were grouped under "miscellaneous staff" instead of having their specific credit.

Despite this recognition, intimacy coordinators continue to face media scrutiny implying they might not be industry essential, with high-profile performers rejecting their participation. Lawrence's perspective mirrors that of another prominent actress, who previously shared she refused professional supervision while filming alongside her co-star on their television series.

Jennifer's Perspective

"Jon was such a gentleman – truly every move, every cut, 'You comfortable?'" she remembered. "The scenes were also carefully planned. That's the advantage of working with skilled editors, appropriate music. So, you don't prepare."

She added, "They offered, 'Professional verification if you're comfortable,' and I responded, 'Honestly, this is awkward enough!' We're experienced professionals – we can manage appropriately. And we had Mimi on set."

Other Examples and Industry Reaction

Despite featuring numerous scenes of intimate moments and frequent nudity, the award-winning film – the director's acclaimed project about a sex worker and a Russian oligarch's son – filmed without an on-set professional.

Mikey Madison explained she and fellow actor Mark Eydelshteyn "concluded it would be preferable to maintain privacy."

"The role I play is a professional in adult entertainment, and I had studied Sean's films and recognized his dedication to realism. I was professionally ready for it. As an actress, I treated it as professional work."

Her comments generated significant backlash from industry professionals, similar to the reaction to another actress's recent comments, who recently shared that working on her new movie Marty Supreme marked her first encounter with the emerging role, which she "was unaware of previously."

Paltrow's Perspective

When asked about comfort level with a specific move alongside fellow actor her younger counterpart, the actress answered: "I belong to the era where you remove clothing, you assume position, the camera's on."

She continued that she and Chalamet then informed the professional: "We believe we're good. You can step back.' I don't know how it is for newer performers, but... if someone is instructing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an creative professional, very stifled by that."

Professional Reaction

Following these comments, industry executive Caroline Hollick labeled them "concerning" and highlighted that most of those speaking against intimacy coordinators have established careers to command their own power and protection on film sets.

"Periodically an actor makes comments about whether they value intimacy coordinators or not," said Hollick. "Gwyneth Paltrow mentioned she grew up in a period when industry professionals 'took our kit off and got on with it'. As a established actress in Hollywood working with a actor considerably junior than her, although likely he is chill, I found it quite an irresponsible remark."

Male Perspective

The veteran actor, meanwhile, shared that he feels the main obligation during heterosexual sex scenes rests with the male performer, instead of a third party.

"Based on my career, you assume duty as the male actor to ensure the female co-star is at ease, you discuss it thoroughly," he explained. "You state, '{OK, I'm going to make contact there if that's acceptable'. It's very deliberate but appears like it's happening naturally, which is ideally what authentic performance looks like."